1 - to see and hopefully depict a continuation of steady progress with the cast and the developing directors
2 - to use blur (out of focus) as an allegory to the development of the production development both in terms of the actors and the directors.
As it happened only one of the joint directors attended last night, which whilst a disappointment in terms of capturing their developing relationship, made it easier for me to compose!
Viewing these photographs in this post might be done best by "clicking" on an image and seeing them in series as a manual slide show
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5dd9/f5dd9c6814efb9824506f353a5703e11b84f34fe" alt=""
Left Nikon D3 18-300mm set at 52mm (78 equivalent), f4.8, 1/10th sec, ISO 3200. Right Nikon D3 85mm f4.0, 1/80th sec, ISO 3200
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6202a/6202a7156d795322568a16b40f5cbcd5729e3d09" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5684d/5684d113fad6978ca88e138d47e56d90dbd7d19c" alt=""
The next section is an experiment. I had used depth of focus as a metaphor in the first rehearsal post and I wanted to return to it. These initial two shots were meant to portray a solid base in the auditorium whilst the stage was unsteady. These two Nikon D200 85mm (127mm equivalent), f1.4, 1/125th sec ISO 1600
Whereas now I have moved to a completely abstract depiction. These two don't offer much in the way of narrative description, being too far out of focus to "deliver" any meaningful value. After reviewing in camera I decided to swap camera body and try different levels of "out of focus" to see if there was any value in the exercise. These two Nikon D200 85mm (127mm equivalent), f1.4, 1/250th sec ISO 1600
These two have interesting opatterns and shapes but are "too disconnected" to carry any narrative. These twoNikon D3 85mm, f1.4, 1/200th sec, ISO 3200
I then decided, with these three to work the "focus" further and tried to get a series with varying degrees of de-focus. I think the context , which is reasonably discernible in the third feeds back into the earlier two? First shot Nikon D3, 85mm , f1.4, 1/320th sec, ISO 3200. Second two shots Nikon D3, 85mm , f1.4, 1/250th sec, ISO 3200
These next four are from the "other way around" as compared to the set of three above i.e. clearest first
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ea652/ea6523b01d889c6149ae643c9c12c79959a415c6" alt=""
All five shots Nikon D3, 85mm, f4.0, 1/50th sec, ISO 3200
These last five are a set - with a consistent level of "de-focus" through a piece of dialogue of all three characters at a table. The three actors all engage with the script physically and I tried to depict that as they engage with the plot and interact with eachother
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08e83/08e831085fdf44605a74d79d50ce780569f5611e" alt=""
Very creative idea to have the slowly decreasing blur as everything comes into focus. I agree with you about the disconnection of two of them. Made me think as well of films where you have two people one nearer, and the camera blurs on each one as it focusses on the other. It seems to add tension to the scene.
ReplyDeleteCatherine
Thanks Catherine. I'm not sure it has worked that well and will continue with it for a few more rehearsals, I wish I had been more courageous in the "out of focus" from the outset. Nevertheless it's all about the learning process. I think the "focus cut" shot you refer should work if I can get close enough to a couple of the players in dialogue, but far enough away to be able to have a separation between them. So far I've only used focus to differentiate "us" the non-players and "them" the players; I'll need a decent length telephoto to do that and then once they've finished the blocking.
ReplyDeleteIt's all so technical isn't it - the play as well as the photography. Your insider knowledge is really coming through though in terms of how you're approaching all this.
Delete