Friday, 18 May 2012

Bits and Pieces

As I start to become mobile again after nearly three weeks suffering from a sprained ankle and some strained eyes as I've done a lot of reading, I'm looking forward to getting out and taking some photographs again. I am hoping to get to the Holywell Rooms and the Ashmolian again next week. I'm also hoping to get a firm interview date with both Chris Friel and Tom Hunter, both of whom have agreed to meet and chat.

Oxford Artweeks was interesting; I sold a few prints and will deliver four large (for me anyway) A2 framed prints mounted to A1 size for a lounge in the next village. I'm hoping they look ok together - the room is large enough to cope with these monochrome prints, slightly warm-toned to compliment the tones in the room. One of the prints that I'll deliver - here left - was also used as an inspiration by a painter friend which he subsequently sold at his Artweeks exhibition. The price he set for it was considerably more than my price! He didn't offer any commission on the sale.....












The sponsors of the Cape Town Opera and Lord's Taverners have provided the first draft of their souvenir programme and have used a few of my images. I think they have a way to go before the text is finalised, but it's good to see my images in place. The piece needs some more work but I thought the sublimation of Wren was.....interesting (not my words). I hope to include the final artwork in the learning log.

_________________________________________________________________________________



THE SHELDONIAN THEATRE
Words by Kerry Underwood, photography by John Umney, building by Christopher Wren

The Sheldonian Theatre was built between 1664-1669 and was the first major design of Sir Christopher Wren, later responsible for St Paul’s Cathedral in London, and for the first use of the phrase “Here’s one I made earlier”.

It is based on Serlio’s illustration of the Theatre of Marcellus but the fragmentary aisle pediments described by Pevsner as “strikingly impure”, against the nave pediment are a Palladio motif, and the interior with its gilded wooden ropes along the painted ceiling is a memory of the velarium of Roman Circuses.

Sheldonian Theatre exterior. John Umney

It is named after Gilbert Sheldon, Warden of All Souls College and later Archbishop of Canterbury and is the ceremonial hall of the University of Oxford.

Christopher Wren

Christopher Wren was Professor of Astronomy at the University of Oxford and designed the Sheldonian Theatre in 1663. He was 31 at the time. Subsequently he became Surveyor to the King and dominated English architecture in the final third of the Seventeenth Century with St Paul’s Cathedral being his most famous building.






Gilbert Sheldon

Gilbert Sheldon was a Derbyshire man whose father was the servant of an Earl.  He entered the Church and attended Charles at Oxford when the King vowed to restore all of his seizures from the Church and the laity if he recovered his crown.

Sheldon hid this written vow for 13 years.  He was arrested by Parliament but freed on condition that he kept five miles away from the King and from Oxford.  He spent much of his time collecting for poor clergy and then for the exiled Charles the Second, although at the Restoration he refused to administer Holy Communion to the dissolute monarch.

He was Archbishop of Canterbury from 1663-1677 and thus gave the lie to the old rhyme

“Derbyshire born, Derbyshire bred;
Thick in arm and Thick in head”

(Regionalism is not yet one of the protected characteristics under the Equality Act 2010).



Detail. Interior Sheldonian Theatre
 John Umney








The Architecture



This section relies heavily on the Buildings of England by Nikolaus Pevsner always the last word on any of this country’s architectural gems (and otherwise!)

The façade is classical, the first such building in Oxford and revolutionary for that city “but nationally speaking this façade has nothing of the purity of Inigo Jones’s masterpieces. In fact it is, as a young amateur’s job, just a little confused.” (Pevsner’s words, not mine!) The great Pevsner continues:

Seven bays, the middle three emphasized by giant columns, as against the giant pilasters of the sides. Pediment over the centre with garlands in the frieze below and the never wholly satisfactory half-pediments (which had the sanction of Palladio’s church façades) over the sides. Arched main widows, and in the outer bays shell-niches. The upper windows are still of two lights, mullioned, and the pilasters between them are short and broad. This and the odd fish-scale-like decoration mark the façade as immature. The sides and back have even less claim to classicity. High ground floor with broad rusticated pilasters and arches. Small windows only. The same short upper pilasters as on the façade and the same two-light windows. The roof originally had oval dormers. The lantern is of 1838, by Blore, well detailed but larger than the original one. Splendid, excellently carved N doorway and surround. The doorway has a straight cornice on corbels and a horizontal laurel garland in the frieze. Above, a slightly concave recess with broad trophies,  left and right. Big garlands at the top. Even the string course between ground floor and upper floor is carved along here.

The interior is one large hall with seating below and on a gallery. This has wooden columns, painted to look like marble.


Interior, Sheldonian Theatre
John Umney



The Painted Ceiling

The flat ceiling was painted by Robert Streater also known as Streeter, the Serjeant Painter to the King, in his Whitehall studio in 1668-9. James II regretted that Verrio had not done it, and even Verrio was not a master.

It is supposed to imitate a Roman theatre open to the sky, which theatres were protected from the weather by a large awning supported by a network of cords, and the ceiling is painted to represent such an awning, with the cords gilded and in high relief, but what Wren was proudest of was destroyed in the C18. It was the original roof construction, based on an idea and calculations of Wren’s friend Wallis, Savilian Professor of Geometry, published in 1649. The ceiling spans 70 by 80 ft without any cross-beams.

The subject is “Truth descending upon the Arts and Sciences” and shows the triumph of Virtues, Arts and Science (including Architecture) over Envy, Hatred, Malice and Tuition Fees.


Detail Sheldonian Theatre ceiling
John Umney

The following description is from The Natural History of Oxfordshire by Robert Plot, Professor of Chemistry and First Keeper of the Ashmolean Museum in the University of Oxford.

This was published in 1705, which is handy as it means that it is 257 years out of copyright which has saved us a few quid.

The Circle of Figures consists first of Theology [23], with her Book with Seven Seals, imploring the assistance of Truth [18], for the unfolding of it.  On her left hand is the Mosaical Law [23] vailed, with the Tables of Stone, to which she points with her Iron Rod. On her right-hand is the gospel [23], with the Cross in one hand, and a Chalice in the other.  In the same division over the Mosaical Law  is History [23], holding up her Pen as dedicating it to Truth, and an attending  Genius with several Fragments of old Writing, from which she collects her History into her Book: On the other side, near the Gospel, is Divine Poesy [23], with her Harp of David’s fashion.

In the Triangle on the right hand of the Gospel, is also Logick [22] in a posture of Arguing; and in another on the left-hand of the Mosaical Law, is Musick [24] with her Antick Lyre, having a Pen in her hand, and Paper of Musick Notes on her knee, with a Genius on her right-hand (a little within the partition of Theology) playing on a Flute, being the Emblem  of the most ancient Musick; and on the left (but within the partition for Physick) Dramatick Poesy [19], with a Vizor representing Comedy, a Bloody Dagger for Tragedy, and the Reed Pipe for Pastoral.

In the Square on the right side of the Circle, is Law [19], with her ruling Scepter, accompanies with Records, Pattents, and Evidences on the one side; and on the other with Rhetorick: by these is an attending Genius with the Scales of Justice; and a Figure with a Palm-branch, the Emblem of Reward for Virtuous Actions; and the Roman Fasces, the marks of Power and Punishment. Printing [19], with a Case of Letters in one hand, and a Form ready set in the other, and by her several Sheets hanging as a drying.

(Could not have put it better myself - Ed)


















Key to painted ceiling.
The numbers in the text refer to
the numbers on the ceiling


On the left side of the Circle opposite to Law, is Physick, holding the Knotty Staff of Esculapius, with a Serpent winding about it: The Botanist [19] imploring the assistance of Truth, in the right understanding of the nature of her Plants: Chymistry [19], with a Retort in her hands: and Chyrurgery [19] preparing her self to finish the Dissecting of a Head, which hath the Brain already opened, and held before he by one of the Genii.

On the other side of the Circle opposite to Theology, in three Squares are the Mathematical Sciences (depending on Demonstration, as the other on Faith) in the first of which is Astronomy [13] with the Celestial Globe, Geography [13] with the Terrestrial, together with three attending Genii; having Arithmetick [14] in the Square on one Hand, with a Paper of Figures; Optick [14] with the Perspective-Glass; Geometry [14] with a pair of Compasses  in her left, and a Table with Geometrical Figures in it, in her right Hand: And in the Square on the other Hand, Architecture [12] embracing the Capitel of a Column, with Compasses,  and the Norma or Square lying by Her: and a Workman holding another Square in one Hand, and a Plumb-line in the other.

In the midst of these Squares and Triangles (as descending from above) is the Figure of Truth [18] sitting on a Cloud, in one Hand holding a Palm-branch (the Emblem of Victory) in the other the Sun, whose brightness enlightens the whole Circle of Figures, and is so bright, that it seems to hide the Face of Her self  to the Spectators below.

Over the entrance of the Front of the Theatre are three Figures tumbling down; first Envy [8] with Her Snaky Hairs, Squint Eyes, Hags Breasts, pale and venomous Complection, strong but ugly Limbs, and rivel’d Skin, frighted from above by the sight of the shield of Pallas, with the Gorgon’s Head in it, against which she opposes Her Snaky Tresses, but Her fall is so precipitous, that she has no command of Her Arms.

Then Rapine [30] with her fiery Eyes, grinning Teeth, sharp Twangs, her Hands imbrewed in Blood, holding a Bloody Dagger in one hand, in the other a Burning Flambeau, with these Instruments threatening the destruction of Learning, and all its Habitations, but is overcome, and so prevented by an Herculean Genius, or Power.  Next that is represented brutish scoffing Ignorance [3], endeavouring to vilify and contemn what she understands not, which is charmed by a Mercurial Genius with his Caduceus’.

Well it was free because it is out of copyright and this is a charity concert.


Ceiling Sheldonian Theatre
John Umney


Fittings and sculpture

The organ case was designed by Sir Thomas Jackson in 1876.

The exterior is adorned with sculptures, including statues of Archbishop Sheldon, the first Duke of Ormonde and the second King Charles in Roman dress.

On the rounded north side is a palisade with carved heads of philosophers on the stone pillars.

The stone carving was by William Byrd, an Oxford sculptor, and Thomas Robinson was the  master-mason.

Richard Cleer, a London master wood-carver, was responsible for the two rostra which face each other across the interior of the theatre. 

These were designed for use by the two Proctors of the University on ceremonial occasions and the fasces projecting from their fronts symbolize the Proctors’ authority.



Sir Thomas Jackson’s organ case
John Umney


Paintings

The theatre contains four large paintings.  One is a portrait of Sir Christopher Wren begun by Antonio Verrio (died 1707) and completed after his death by Sir James Thornhill and Sir Godfrey Kneller.

One of the other portraits is of Gilbert Sheldon and another is of the Duke of Ormonde and is a copy by Edmund Ashfield of an original by Sir Peter Lely at Chatsworth House.  The Duke of Ormonde is also represented by one of the statues outside. He was Commander of the Cavalier forces in Ireland and from 1649-50 led the Royalist forces against Cromwell’s conquest of Ireland and then lived in exile in Europe with Charles II.  Upon the Restoration of Charles II to the throne in 1660 the Duke of Ormonde became a major figure in England and Irish politics.  He became Chancellor the University of Oxford on 4 August 1669, hence the painting and statue.

The fourth portrait by Sir Peter Lely and is of the Bishop of Durham, Nathaniel Crewe, the founder of the Creweian Oration, though by some to be an annual speech commemorating the University’s benefactors and by others to be the response of the Gresty Road faithful when Crewe Alexandra score a goal.

Tuesday, 15 May 2012

Decisions

So, the gallery says:



Artist must first submit their portfolio or website for the gallery director to review. The director is the one who reviews all submissions and makes the final decision. If your work is chosen for representation you will receive an agreement. Within the agreement there are different representational/promotional offers you may choose from. There is no fee for submitting your works nor are you obligated to accept. 
• At least 5 images of your artwork, or a direct link to your personal website.
• Artwork title, medium and dimensions
• Images must be Jpeg, smaller than 5MB
• Your biography
• Short statement about yourself and your goals

The cost for basic representation is $3,850 for one year (flexible payment plans are available).  Additional services may be included depending on the level of representation that you select.

The basic representation package includes:
  1. Participation in a collective exhibition in their gallery in Chelsea, New York.
  2. Promotion on their web-site
  3. Promotion on their art shopping site, which records more than 300,000 artworks view every month and 10,000 clicks a day
  4. Press release written by an art critic
  5. Inclusion in the exhibition catalog
  6. Personalized PR efforts
  7. Group invitation cards
  8. Ads and listings in New York publications
  9. Assistance, if needed, in pricing your artwork   
Framing and shipping costs are not included in the representation fee. However, if accepted for representation our experienced staff will help you and guide you with shipping your artwork to the gallery for your exhibition.


The commission structure on the sale of art is 70% for the artist and 30% for the gallery.
The questions are:
Why me? 
I've had a look on the art shopping site and the work is varied and selling (priced, which is another thing altogether) at anywhere from about $750 - $3500 a print. My work looks staid by comparison.
Is it a scam? 
I don't think so, but it does seem a high price to pay - annually, even if they have special payment terms.


10,000 clicks a day..........


Ho hum.



Sunday, 13 May 2012

An interesting week

Coming to the end of a long and interesting week. My exhibition at Oxford Artweeks, coming to close today after a week, has been the most successful ever - 5 commissions (4 very large prints and cheques cashed) plus one other, 6 other prints sold, a couple of portrait interests and a healthy profit in cash terms. I had quite a few people seeking me out having either been on the web-site, or that have remembered me from last Artweeks.
I've had confirmation that I will be writing a photography column for a quarterly Arts magazine, my first interviewee has confirmed and I should be meeting the photographer before the end of May, well in time for a copy date of July for the September issue.
Looks like I'll have more time to spend on things as (very) early retirement seems extremely likely.
But most curious was an approach by a gallery in New York that appears to be interested in representing me. Their email said that they have been watching me and have viewed my web-site before approaching me last night. This might be normal for other photographers, but it's the first time I've had an approach - so  it will be interesting to see where it goes.

Saturday, 12 May 2012

The Vermeer coincidence



Making a photograph as opposed to taking a photograph relies on the photographer deciding beforehand what is the point of the picture, what is the narrative that needs to be expressed, what contextual props need to be seen to help develop the scene. The staging of a photograph, like the composition of a painting or the setting of a scene in a play depends on the artist/director's perspective and what is required to be delivered from the construct.
Woman reading a Possession order
reprinted by kind permission of the artist Tom Hunter

Girl at a Window Reading a Letter (oil on canvas)

Vermeer, Jan (1632-75)

Gemaeldegalerie Alte Meister, Dresden,...
Tom Hunter, Professor in Photography Research, London College of Communications, University of the Arts, London is a photographer who makes (creates) staged photographs. The photograph right won the John Kobal Photographic Portrait Award 2008, it depicts a young female contemplating, what the title leads us to believe is, an eviction order. A baby, again we assume this is her child, looks toward her for protection. There is no expression on the young ladies face, except maybe resignation. There isn't much else in the frame to guide us, the surroundings aren't opulent, there are no curtains on the window. The baby rests on a shawl on top of what we assume is a bed. It is a melancholy image. The title directs and leads the viewer to an emotional conclusion. The subject and her baby will be out on the streets before long. Job done.
The use of headlines in newspapers are designed to draw a potential viewer to consummate the commercial transaction and pick the paper up, in the same way that commercial television relies on ratings to attract advertising revenue, it's sole purpose in life is to delivery people to the advertiser, to draw the viewer in. Footfall, the possibility of a potential sale in vastly increased if the newspaper or the television controller can attract a viewer long enough to engage with them. If Hunter's picture above was untitled it would have much less of an impact, the narrative directed by him impels the viewer to understand the plight of "mother and baby" - where will they go now? Hunter "made" this photograph as his contribution to the fight to save the buildings and street where he was squatting, amongst about 100 other people. The protest worked, the street and the community are still there.
Hunter's inspiration for the photograph above came from Verneer's "Girl at a window Reading a letter" by Vermeer - left. There are a number a things to say about the use of, what might be termed "high art", as an inspiration; Hunter has used a friend as a model, the letter was indeed a Possession Order, the baby was the child of the young woman, he posed them specifically to mirror the Vermeer painting, it was therefore, a fiction - a staged contrivance to develop a specific narrative to the mind of the viewer. Exactly as a headline might do, it was composed to draw the viewer in, to cogitate on the consequence of the letter. The Vermeer painting is, seemingly, less dramatic; it takes some research to find out that there is a theory that the letter the girl is reading might be from her fiancé who is away with the Dutch forces defending the country against the Spanish and the Catholic church. Though the use of apples - the "fall of Eve" in the composition suggests that the letter maybe from an illicit relationship. There are no words to be viewed on the letter suggesting that the contents of the letter are deemed private. The fact that she reads a letter situates her, and her correspondent, into the upper strata of Dutch society.  Personal dramas both. However I think Hunter's inspiration gains further momentum as it draws together the dispossessed - the squatters, living as they do at the lower strata of society - with their counterparts, the typical viewers of high art. Painting, especially at places such as the National Gallery does not have a regular clientele from the social class D/E, those hallowed halls are more usually frequented by Classes A & B. Vermeer's "Girl.." nominally of either A or B is now being juxtaposed with her counterparts in today's society.
Lucas Cranach the Elder, Cupid complaining to Venus, about 1525 Oil on wood
National Gallery


Girls' Sex Acts in Club: Court.Cop: 'It can only be
described as having Sex through Clothes"
reprinted by kind permission of the artist Tom Hunter


These twin shots bare some interesting comparison. The Hunter shot showing the stripper in an exorbitant pose, whilst a "punter" moves in for a closer view. At first sight this appears to be a wholly salacious image, the exploitation of the woman for the gratification of the male viewer, both the viewer in the frame and of the frame itself. Hunter's inspiration, the painting by Cranach the Elder, one of very many that he did of the same subject, almost to the point of apparent obsession, displays a young nubile exfoliated girl, who looks directly at the viewer. Her watcher, Cupid, is being ignored despite his protestations as she is clearly performing and being admired for what she is being depicted as - a sex object. The Cranach to me seems more morally dubious - should such a charge be levelled at art -  than the Hunter interpretation of it. Whilst both females are depicted as objects of desire, the Cranach seems more wanton; Venus takes no heed of cupid, despite his obvious cry for help, she is uniformly well lit and her hips are turned to the viewer for to gaze at her sexual parts. Hunter's take is also provocative, but this is a photograph taken for the public to gaze, the Cranach will have been painted for a private commission and drooled over for private pleasure.
Recently I had the opportunity to take a series of pictures of a young woman, After some consideration I had decided that a re-take of Vermeer's "Girls" would be a good idea; most of them surround a single female in various poses. I would set the shot up and try for a modern take - "girl reading an email on her smartphone" was one that I had thought of. As it turned out the young lady had to drop out and the series never got shot. At that stage I was unaware of Hunter's work. I am very glad I didn't go through with it, not only only would my work pale by comparison - Hunter shoots with a large format camera - but my takes would have been thin on narrative. Hunter takes a multi layered approach with these shots, not only are they a modern take, but they wrap the narrative into a comment on both on contemporary society and of the time their inspirations came from. The elevation of the subject and subject matter in Hunter's images to high art, where both are unusual and most times unwelcome visitors, subverts the privilege that the "high art" seeks to occupy as a rite.
These images, rich in metaphor and allusion, cause the viewer to stop and examine not only the plight of the subjugated class that it utilises, but also the fetishised and elevated status of "high art".


Lady writing a letter with her Maid, c.1670 (oil on canvas)

Vermeer, Jan (1632-75)
National Gallery of Ireland, Dublin,...Bridgman
Girl Writing an Affadavit
reprinted by kind permission of the artist Tom Hunter
Again, my tutor had pointed out this photographer's work to me and I am very grateful for him doing so, whilst reading up on Hunter's background I notice with interest that the initial inspiration for Hunter embarking on the Vermeer series (and the consequent use of other artists in a similar way) was his tutor - Peter Kennard, whose piece "Haywain with Cruise Missiles" itself a subversion of Constable's iconic painting "The Haywain" which I had seen at the V&A postmodernist show last year. Circles in circles.


Here is a Radio broadcast where Hunter discusses the his award winning photograph
Additional resource:
Living In Hell and Other Stories - National Gallery ISBN 1-85709-331-3
Essays on Tom Hunter's website are here which includes the transcript of the essay he delivered on Radio 3 entitled "Under the Influence" on March 201